The Safe ID Act
A brief summary of both privacy anti-offshoring bills pending on Capitol Hill, one sponsored by Hillary Clinton, the other by Congressman Edward Markey
*******************************************************
HILLARY CLINTON’S SENATE BILL
"THE SAFE ID ACT"
Senate Bill 810
• Businesses cannot transfer personal information to a foreign country without offering consumers notice and an opt-out choice.
• Business cannot discriminate if a consumer opts-out.
• Health care businesses must not terminate a relationship if a consumer opts-out.
• Businesses are liable for any improper storage or misuse of information.
Additional measure for Health and Financial information (adds HIPAA and GLB requirements.)
*******************************************************
REPRESENTATIVE MARKEY’S BILL
House Resolution 1653
• If a county has “adequate privacy protection,” consumers must be offered an “opt-out.”
• If it is a country “without adequate privacy protection,” consumers must affirmatively “opt-in.”
• The Federal Trade Commission must certify those countries which have adequate privacy protection.
• The FTC should consider the adequacy of the country's infrastructure for detecting, evaluating, and responding to privacy
violations.
• The FTC MUST assume a country is inadequate if its laws are less protective that federal or that of ANY STATE.
*******************************************************
HILLARY CLINTON’S SENATE BILL
"THE SAFE ID ACT"
Senate Bill 810
• Businesses cannot transfer personal information to a foreign country without offering consumers notice and an opt-out choice.
• Business cannot discriminate if a consumer opts-out.
• Health care businesses must not terminate a relationship if a consumer opts-out.
• Businesses are liable for any improper storage or misuse of information.
Additional measure for Health and Financial information (adds HIPAA and GLB requirements.)
*******************************************************
REPRESENTATIVE MARKEY’S BILL
House Resolution 1653
• If a county has “adequate privacy protection,” consumers must be offered an “opt-out.”
• If it is a country “without adequate privacy protection,” consumers must affirmatively “opt-in.”
• The Federal Trade Commission must certify those countries which have adequate privacy protection.
• The FTC should consider the adequacy of the country's infrastructure for detecting, evaluating, and responding to privacy
violations.
• The FTC MUST assume a country is inadequate if its laws are less protective that federal or that of ANY STATE.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home